Every compared FastAPI vs Flask?

Zoltan Fehervari - Jun 5 - - Dev Community

I have come to understand that when developing web applications, selecting the right Python web framework is crucial. FastAPI and Flask are two popular options that have gained traction recently.

I will attempt to introduce these frameworks and highlight their key features and differences.

FastAPI: A modern web framework for building APIs with Python 3.7+. It focuses on speed and performance, using Python type hints for fast development, automatic API documentation, and editor support. It also supports asynchronous programming, making it suitable for real-time applications.

Flask: A lightweight web framework that is easy to use and highly customizable. Ideal for small to medium-sized web applications and RESTful APIs, Flask follows a minimalist “micro-framework” philosophy, allowing developers to choose their own libraries and extensions.

Performance and Scalability

FastAPI: Known for high performance due to Pydantic models and Starlette for handling requests. It supports asynchronous programming, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.

Flask: While not as fast as FastAPI, Flask is still a performant framework. It uses Werkzeug for handling requests and Jinja2 for templating, suitable for smaller applications.

Performance Benchmarks: FastAPI outperforms Flask in terms of requests per second and maximum concurrent requests. However, performance depends on specific use cases.

Scalability: Both frameworks are scalable, but FastAPI’s asynchronous programming and Pydantic models make it better suited for high-throughput applications. Flask’s modular design supports scalability for less demanding projects.

Routing and Request Handling

FastAPI: Provides a powerful routing system based on Python type hints. It supports asynchronous request handling for better performance and generates automatic documentation for all routes.

Flask: Offers a simple and customizable routing system. It handles requests synchronously, which may be less optimal for high-concurrency applications.

Database Integration

FastAPI: Supports popular databases like SQLite, PostgreSQL, and MySQL. It integrates well with ORMs such as SQLAlchemy, Tortoise ORM, and GINO, supporting asynchronous database operations.

Flask: Does not have built-in database support but offers extensions like Flask-SQLAlchemy and Flask-MySQL. It supports ORMs like SQLAlchemy and Pony ORM, providing flexibility in choosing databases.

Authentication and Authorization

FastAPI: Provides built-in support for OAuth2, including password, client credentials, and JWT grant types. It supports scopes for granular authorization.

Flask: Uses extensions like Flask-Login for authentication and Flask-Security for authorization. These extensions offer a wide range of security features, including SQLAlchemy and MongoEngine integration.

Documentation and Testing

FastAPI: Excellent documentation with step-by-step guides, code examples, and interactive API documentation (Swagger UI). It has a built-in testing framework and supports popular testing tools like Pytest.

Flask: Well-organized documentation with a comprehensive API reference. It supports interactive API documentation through Flask-RESTful and provides a built-in testing framework compatible with Pytest and Nose.

Community and Communication

FastAPI: Rapidly growing community with a supportive environment. It has a smaller but active ecosystem of plugins and libraries.

Flask: Large and well-established community with an extensive ecosystem of plugins and libraries. However, not all plugins are actively maintained.

Use Cases and Project Suitability

FastAPI: Best for high-performance APIs, scalable projects, teams that prioritize type hints, and real-time applications.

Flask: Ideal for small to medium-sized projects, customizable and unopinionated development, simpler codebases, and integration with third-party libraries.

*Performance Benchmarks and Real-World Examples
*

FastAPI: Excels in performance benchmarks and is used in high-performance applications like the OpenAPI project.

Flask: Suitable for smaller web applications, such as the microblogging platform Flaskr.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .